By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zorg1000 said:
reviniente said:

He implied thinking otherwise would be ridiculous. That much is factual. 

No he didnt, thats just how you interpreted it.

He said its rediculous to assume everybody would think better graphics make a game more enjoyable, in no way does that imply that people would think worse graphics make a game more enjoyable.

The ones that doesn't think improving graphics improve your enjoyment would have stayed on their Atari and NES... you can say some doesn't care as much as others about graphics, but even so they praise the improvement on graphics their console of choice get.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."