reviniente said:
zorg1000 said:
Nice strawman, he never said graphics/performance were terrible things and should regress, why not adress the actual points being brought up?
For some people, having the best visuals & performance is extremely important. For others, gyro controls or portability are more important.
For me portability is very important, i wake up and get ready for work at 4am and usually dont get home until after 6pm. When i get home i play with my kids until they go to bed, then i try to get in a quick workout then i relax with my wife for about an hour and go to bed.
A good deal of my gaming comes during my daily commute to/from work. I carpool with 2 other guys and depending on where we are working its usually 1-2 hours each way so on days that i dont drive i either play a game, read a book, listen to music, watch a show/movie or take a quick nap.
I would say on average, i game at home on the TV 1-2 hours/week and play portable away from home 2-3 hours/week.
|
You understand he never addressed the subject of portability, right? He questioned the outright preposterous notion of a video game being more enjoyable simply because it looks better. The gall. And be honest; were you lord and master of your own free time, would you give the Switch the light of day?
|
Nah, hes not saying that individuals cant find a game better because of visuals, hes saying that its rediculous to assume everybody is going to enjoy a game more because of better visuals.
Absolutely, regardless of Switch being portable i would still find it more appealing than PS4 or XBO. Portability doesnt really add much if the software library isnt appealing.
