By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The_Liquid_Laser said:
FentonCrackshell said:

BC certainly isn't helping X1. And it certainly didn't help WiiU. And I don't know anyone bout any of those consoles off the basis of BC. Inversely no one didn't buy them because they're not BC. I can't imagine someone saying "I don't want an X1 because I can't play my old X360 games on it." That makes absolutely no sense. Also, we're 5 years into the PS4's life cycle and we're still arguing the fact that it doesn't play games that are probably a decade old.

Look, there are always plenty of new games out there to play. Yes it's nice to have BC but it's not a deal breaker to not have it. When I had a 360, a Wii, and a WiiU I never thought once about playing an XBOX, GameCube, or Wii game. I'm sure that's not "just me". The BC/sales correlation is purely coincidental. As a matter a fact, the BC consoles all released at a time when video games had become extremely more popular and had broader appeal. That's why those consoles so more than the non-BC consoles.

Hey, you're right.  BC doesn't guarantee success.  Not having BC doesn't mean automatic failure.  But look at the overall trend, and BC is strongly correlated with success.

The only strong correlation is in your mind, using only an average of an arbitrary number.

Easier way to see it... X360 didn't had BC, launch PS3 had... PS3 removed BC and reduced cost, selling more, didn't affect much X360... PS4 and X1 didn't had BC, X1 got it, sales didn't really change... so BC is unconsequential.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."