CrazyGamer2017 said:
No I don't understand it. Again you don't marry someone you met 5 minutes ago, you get to know people sometimes for years before marriage, so if they guy is some kind of freak who loves to force himself then you should have noticed and not married him. Even from the guy's point of view this makes no sense to me. I understand rape as an act someone does cause there is NO other way to have sex with someone he fancies but raping his wife? It's the only person you can screw in a totally socially approved way, hell it's weird if you don't want to, so why would you want to rape someone you can have sex with pretty much any time? It's as if a thief owned a food store and went to "steal" stuff inside his store. What's the point? He owns everything in the store so why put on a mask and rob the place? Don't get me wrong, I get it that these laws are good and will protect women that could be abused in their marriage, I'm not against such laws, I'm just saying I don't get it from a purely logical point of view. |
And this is how, despite the laws supposedly being equal, that in reality sexism still exists. Because you want to blame the woman for being raped by her husband, and your logic is essentially that they shouldn't have married them if they didn't want to get raped. Well, guess what? Most people that are raped, the perpetrator is someone they know! And a quarter of people, it's their spouse/former spouse.
