Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior

[OhNoYouDont]

dark_gh0st_b0y said:

OhNoYouDont said:

Nope just fundamentally wrong. Religious faith is belief absent evidence, which is antithetical to the entirety of logic. The entire point of logic is to get to what is true either deductively or inductively, e.g. via evidence. Did you even read the Bible? It says verbatim "being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see."

Theology is like studying fairies, entirely fruitless. 

I think there is tons of evidence, the thing is if you trust/accept them or not, no Jesus is gonna come to you just to prove the is real :P

what is missing is ''proof'' in terms of logic, which makes sense to me, religion is based on belief that there are beings of a higher intelligence and spiritual existence in another dimension, it is to be expected that human logic is not powerful enough to understand and explain everything related

Yeah any time I've spoken to any theist about their "evidence" it isn't evidence, it isn't even coherent. Most of them cannot even explain what they mean by the word "god". It's this ineffable, ambiguous idea that has no positive descriptors e.g. NON-physical, time-LESS, space-LESS, etc. You cannot define what something is by telling me what it is NOT. 

Why wouldn't a Jesus return in this time when Christianity is dwindling in the civilized world? Seems an appropriate moment, no? Oh, he only comes when there aren't any cameras, kinda like ghosts huh? Funny how that works...

Are you saying you think logic isn't a reliable path to getting at what is true? What other method do you use to discover whether a statement about the world is true?