contestgamer said:
The only investigation that should be needed is whether the the guy tried to burglar your home.
Why not? Maybe that's what the law says in some places, but that doesn't make it right. He took the risk, he gets the consequences. |
An investigation is to find out the truth, and from that determine whether a crime is commited.
Let's look at some other possible scenarios:
- Home owner tricks or coerces someone into his home and stabs him to death, claims burglary.
- burglar enters home because they are threatened by another to do so. Home owner finds intruder and chases them out of the house, killing them as they are leaving. This kind of thing happens all the time, using someone vulnerable to do your dirty work when the risk is too great for yourself.
- someone enters your home under immediate threat from something (perhaps they have been attacked but manage to escape and flee to the nearest home in order to find help) home owner kills on site because they suspect burglary.
Capital punishement for minor crimes, and carte blanche get out of jail free cards for killing when it's your property are not indicative of a good justice system, as someone else said in the thread it's rarely so black and white. You don't just suddenly get morals at 16.
Last edited by HigHurtenflurst - on 07 April 2018






