Native 4K not worth it.

Gaming - Native 4K not worth it. - View Post

DonFerrari

Currently Offline

151,757

29654 posts since 24/11/10

Escape Artist Managed to avoid being banned for 1 month.
You've Reached the Bronze Age Subscribed at least one month as a Bronze Tier Supporter.
Trust Me, It'll Have Legs 100 replies made to user's most popular thread.
13 Years Has been a VGChartz member for over 13 years.
Site Veteran Has been a VGChartz member for over 5 years.
Genocide 5,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.

DonFerrari on 05 April 2018

JWeinCom said:
4K is equal to 4000. That is nearly 4 times as much as 1080 and thusly nearly 4 times better. Check and mate.

simple as that... it really is 4x more pixel (1920x1080=2,075Mp and 3840x2160 = 8,3Mp)

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."