Is David Hogg just a bully now? Uses followers to go on personal vendetta.

[o_O.Q]

the-pi-guy said:

o_O.Q said:

"And what sides are you talking about in terms of snowflakes? I was talking about the people on the right that are like Ben Shapiro, Laura Ingraham that act like a victim in so many cases."

 

how can you seriously make this argument in good faith when the entire agenda of the left is to encourage every group under the sun besides white men to play the victim:

"women you have been oppressed by men for centuries so you need to tear down the patriarchy" (never mind that it was men who developed most of the advancements that allowed women to have the freedom they have today)

"blacks you have been oppressed by centuries by white people so you need to fear and hate them" (never mind that white people fought to abolish slavery)

"transgenders you have been oppressed by white man developed heteronomativity and biology so you need to tear down the patriarchy"

 

and i could go on all day with this retarded bullshit, come on man you aren't being fair here

how can you seriously make this argument in good faith when the entire agenda of the left is to encourage every group under the sun besides white men to play the victim:

Sure, just like rightism encourages white men to play the victim. The big one: "The atheist left is trying to take away your Christianity." , but I can't forget "The left wants Islam to be taught in schools, and supports terrorism!"

"women you have been oppressed by men for centuries so you need to tear down the patriarchy" (never mind that it was men who developed most of the advancements that allowed women to have the freedom they have today)

This one doesn't make any sense.  The big reason why men had to "develop advancements to allow women to have freedom" is because for many societies women just didn't have freedom.  There wasn't any big reason they didn't.  There are some societies that are matriarchal.  They didn't need any "advancements". 
Many people on the left don't understand the pay gap issue, there is that.  But even on this, they are closer to being right than this nonsense.   

"blacks you have been oppressed by centuries by white people so you need to fear and hate them" (never mind that white people fought to abolish slavery)

White people don't need to be feared and hated.  There are some on the left that sometimes go to those extremes, but they are a vocal minority.  And sure, white people fought to abolish slavery, that doesn't mean that slavery didn't happen.  It also doesn't mean that all the things in the next century following the abolition of slavery didn't happen either.  

"transgenders you have been oppressed by white man developed heteronomativity and biology so you need to tear down the patriarchy"

This one is just wrong.  Transgenderism has nothing to do with not liking biology, or tearing down the patriarchy.  There are people that are biologically XY that don't have a penis, and people that are biologically XX that do.  Biology is vastly more complicated than XY=penis, and XX=vagina.  

"Sure, just like rightism encourages white men to play the victim."

that's not true though, can you give an example?

 

""The atheist left is trying to take away your Christianity.""

i could only see this being valid if christianity was exclusively for white men... but its not... so what's your point?

 

"The left wants Islam to be taught in schools, and supports terrorism!""

these women are feminists:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbJONNIU0Cc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ev66F8U4L8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jWSDyJiIXg

i mean i could go on here but feminist advocacy for islam is pretty apparent to anyone who has been paying attention

i suppose the second component is whether its a violent religion or not

...well that seems pretty clear to me...

"There wasn't any big reason they didn't.  There are some societies that are matriarchal.  They didn't need any "advancements". "

birth control? the industrial revolution reducing the need for physical labor? you really don't understand how these technological advancements among others emancipated women?

can you name a matriarchal society not living out in the bush? you do understand that i'm framing this from the context of modern civilisation right?

 

"White people don't need to be feared and hated.  There are some on the left that sometimes go to those extremes, but they are a vocal minority."

i've been imagining the mainstream media calling for blacks to be wary of white policeman for all those weeks then

 

"This one is just wrong.  Transgenderism has nothing to do with not liking biology"

 

"There are people that are biologically XY that don't have a penis, and people that are biologically XX that do. "

there are people who have eight legs but we define a human as having 2 legs right?

a classification does not mean there will be no outliers

is your argument therefore that we should simply throw away all classifications since outliers happen across just about everything?

or is the more sensible path to acknowledge that in order to have classification a generalisation must be made?

 

"Biology is vastly more complicated than XY=penis, and XX=vagina. "

well i think when you consider that 99.92% of the time this is the case then we can safely make that assumption 

just like we can safely assume that human means 2 legs

Last edited by o_O.Q - on 03 April 2018