Ail said:
I ask for an example of a small developer successfull on 360 thanks to cross PC-development. you give me a link to a developer that failed on PS3. Answer the question much will you ?
You pick on MikeB but you are not much better. About everyone this gen puts development on the PS3 and the 360 in the same league yet you go to great lenght to explain us how it is different on the 360 and PS3 is the only villain. Besides lets be honest, gaming market grew as a whole this gen. Did some small developers shut their door, sure ? But overall the market grew. Do you go on strike each time a Wall Mart opens and small grocerie store closes ? I bet nope... It's the same thing in every industry so I really fail to understand why small developers are so special but small grocerie stores, small car makers and so on are different... As long as the overall market grows, we win... Now if your whole post was a rant about the evil of capitalism and how progress kills small companies maybe I could understand, but is that your goal ? And if it is, seeing how you are one of the biggest supporter of Microsoft, one of the pillar of capitalism, I find your posts rather ironic.........
|
I kind of agree with the main point as both 360 and PS3 are contributing to that problem, but to say that we don't need small companies is not right. We need the small budget games along with the large ones, and downloadable games is a step in the right direction, but it's not good enough.
What do small grocery stores sell the customers that big ones don't? I can name all kinds of reasons why low budget games are good. Video games is moving towards hollywood, you know the one where they have absolutely no creativity anymore. The one where people don't want to take risks anymore.
currently playing: Skyward Sword, Mario Sunshine, Xenoblade Chronicles X