contestgamer said:
Sure, but anarchism is the absence of state. IMO in the absence of force people will naturally slide in to a hierarchical system based on decentralized authority and power where most of the wealth will be focused in the hands of a few. Without a state, you expect the opposite result? |
In the absence of force? How do you coincide that with wealth being focused in the hands of the few? They would need force to maintain that power. And no, I don't expect the opposite to occur just from abolishing the state, the economic system has to be replaced too.