By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
contestgamer said:
VGPolyglot said:

Anarchism was used as a socialist/leftist term before being appropriated by anarcho-capitalists.

Sure, but anarchism is the absence of state. IMO in the absence of force people will naturally slide in to a hierarchical system based on decentralized authority and power where most of the wealth will be focused in the hands of a few. Without a state, you expect the opposite result?

In the absence of force? How do you coincide that with wealth being focused in the hands of the few? They would need force to maintain that power. And no, I don't expect the opposite to occur just from abolishing the state, the economic system has to be replaced too.