Hiku said:
1. Laura damaged her own image. Hogg brought that to the attention of her sponsors. 2. I know that no one says 'rightist'. The point was to have your arguments speak for themselves without generalizing opinions or positions unnecessarily with labels like that, in a discussion that's not about that. Was it an inherently conservative thing of Laura to out of the blue personally attack Hogg like that? No, it's an asshole thing to do. 3. Sponsors have withdrawn their advertisements time and time again without any influential person rallying people like this. That's not the only criteria for this to occur. I gave you an example with O'Riley. Likewise, there have been many times where companies don't withdraw their sponsorship, in spite of public outcry. For a particularly relevant example, take the NRA boycott aimed at certain companies. Some of them withdrew their support, others like Amazon didn't. 5. Which is why I worded it as 'unprovoked' in her case. 6. I believe what you're referring to is what he said either on the day of, or the day after, his friends were gunned down in masses by a maniac and he luckily survived. Maybe you think it's fair game to criticize someone over what they say right after a situation like that, but I think most people would let that slide given the circumstances of the trauma. Especially if he doesn't repeat it again in the following months. 7. She makes it really easy for herself to be criticized when her 'apology' was a self serving promotion for her show. And not a sincere one either. |
6. There's no excuses. And he believes anyone that votes against gun legislation is bought by NRA money.







