Aeolus451 said:
Ryuu96 said:
You seem to be the one getting annoyed, people are responding to you because you are wrong, Shika stated that "it got a 69 meta which is pretty average" You responded that it's not an average score, since we're talking about Metacritic this is what we're basing it off: http://www.metacritic.com/about-metascores
General Meaning of Score | Movies, TV & Music | Games |
Universal Acclaim |
81 - 100 |
90 - 100 |
Generally Favorable Reviews |
61 - 80 |
75 - 89 |
Mixed or Average Reviews |
40 - 60 |
50 - 74 |
Generally Unfavorable Reviews |
20 - 39 |
20 - 49 |
Overwhelming Dislike |
0 - 19 |
0 - 19 |
It's much closer to 74 than it is 50 so I'm pretty sure that would fall into the 'Average' range by Metacritic's standards, It's also much closer to a 7 than a 6, even if it is in the 60's, unless you can point out where Metacritic states that 'Average' only starts in the 70's then I suggest you drop this conversation.
Edit - Not to mention that we also have a Metacritic topic, which this isn't it.
|
I think this shit is hilarious. I've just been replying to elaborate on earlier posts and offer rebuttals. Some resorted to ad hominem or saying that I bash ms games all the time. *sigh
7 is considered average in most 10 point review systems. A high 6 is still not a 7. I'm not wrong on that. Even what you sourced said it's a mixed review score. *shrugs I'm gonna take your advice and stop replying since people are getting mad enough that ya guys are getting involved.
|
That's wrong. IGN and most other outlets have 7 as "good". A high 6 is basically a 7, just like how a low 7 is basically a 7. Jesus, did you fail grade 4 math or something?
Also "mixed" is average.
Bet with Intrinsic:
The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.