By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 said:
Ryuu96 said:

You seem to be the one getting annoyed, people are responding to you because you are wrong, Shika stated that "it got a 69 meta which is pretty average" You responded that it's not an average score, since we're talking about Metacritic this is what we're basing it off: http://www.metacritic.com/about-metascores

General Meaning of ScoreMovies, TV & MusicGames
Universal Acclaim 81 - 100 90 - 100
Generally Favorable Reviews 61 - 80 75 - 89
Mixed or Average Reviews 40 - 60 50 - 74
Generally Unfavorable Reviews 20 - 39 20 - 49
Overwhelming Dislike 0 - 19 0 - 19

It's much closer to 74 than it is 50 so I'm pretty sure that would fall into the 'Average' range by Metacritic's standards, It's also much closer to a 7 than a 6, even if it is in the 60's, unless you can point out where Metacritic states that 'Average' only starts in the 70's then I suggest you drop this conversation.

Edit - Not to mention that we also have a Metacritic topic, which this isn't it.

I think this shit is hilarious. I've just been replying to elaborate on earlier posts and offer rebuttals. Some resorted to ad hominem or saying that I bash ms games all the time. *sigh

7 is considered average in most 10 point review systems. A high 6 is still not a 7.  I'm not wrong on that. Even what you sourced said it's a mixed review score. *shrugs I'm gonna take your advice and stop replying since people are getting mad enough that ya guys are getting involved.

That's wrong. IGN and most other outlets have 7 as "good". A high 6 is basically a 7, just like how a low 7 is basically a 7. Jesus, did you fail grade 4 math or something?

Also "mixed" is average. 



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.