Stop with the "endless amount of content" excuse. That's just ignorant and looks ridiculous on your part when the main complaint about NMS is that there is nothing to do. Procedurally generated doesn't mean endless content, it means recycled assets. Both games suffer from a lack of meaningful content and you know that. You're just trying to bullshit your way out of your first comment that somehow a single player game should have more content than a multiplayer game (lol), which is just nonsense.
Your post, for context--"I would hope NMS had more content, it was a single player game, despite what Sean said it would be. Imagine if SoT had no multiplayer, lol." And, no, you didn't quote anyone.
All you are doing is deflecting and it looks so silly and childish. My comment was that Rare should have been able to provide a hell of a lot more content than they did and that a comparison with an indie studio does not cast them in a favorable light no matter how you spin it. If it's going to be compared to something, then it should be compared to WoW or that Star Wars MMO, where it gets absolutely pulverized.
And please, please stop suggesting that Microsoft can't adequately fund a first party game. That's nonsense.
Hmm, I have my suspicions that these same people weren't so lenient on NMS. Also, if this is MS's vision of GAAS, then count me out. I'll make sure to support Sony and Nintendo for as long as they stick to traditional gaming.