KiigelHeart said:
It really isn't. Unless from now on we compare every game that doesn't meet all expectations to NMS. SoT is a social experience, even when playing solo you'll most likely have to deal with other players. NMS, by my understanding, is exactly the opposite; you're alone in an endless universe. NMS being made by a very small indie team is not an excuse for lies or false marketing. SoT under delivered in content but at least it had alphas and betas, people had an idea what the game was going to be. General consensus indeed is that it looks pretty, has potential but also lacks much content (for a full-priced game). Even many reviewers say it is a foundation for a great game. Many people who played it have a great time but also criticize the lack of content, because they love the game and want it to become excellent. Then there are people who never played it, never wanted to play it, never wanted it to succeed so they pick all the negative stuff from reviews and form their opinion. For example, I don't think it's likely you'll experience everything the game has to offer in 5 hours but just because some reviewers stated this some take it as a fact. |
Hmm, all that sounds familiar. Oh yes, NMS's launch.
And sorry, but it's not just one reviewer's opinion. It's basically the general consensus.







