Should console-exclusive sites be allowed on metacritic?

[pitzy272]

Azzanation said:

pitzy272 said:

I’m not sure where all these “high” scores are that you’re referencing. The only truly “high” score is the 90 from that Xbox site. You might be able to argue that an 86 is “high”, but every other score is an 82 or lower, which makes them mid-level scores at best.

The rest of your post is just not worth responding to. Don’t know why you’re so desperate to defend this game. If you enjoy it, just enjoy it. 

High scores are indicated in green, average scores are indicated in yellow and bad scores are indicated in red. You are the perfect example of the modern gamer who only accepts 9s as a high score. 9 is closer to perfect, anything 8 and above is considered high which this game is getting aswell.

The bigger question to you is why are you trying to downplay a game i can safely bet you havnt played? Does the score really matter to you?

The word Metacritic uses to define green-highlighted scores is “positive”, not “high.” But spin it however you want. And idk why you keep ranting about this “modern gamer” concept. And you’re basing your assessment of me off of nothing. One of my favorite games this gen has a MC of 83, and another favorite has a 79. And you’re confusing downplaying with my correcting you. A lot of your comments in this thread either make no sense or are just incorrect. But I should have just let it go. You’re obviously very defensive about SoT, and I get that to a degree when it’s a game you really like. Anyway, this is the last response I’ll give. This back and forth isn’t worth it.