SpokenTruth said:
Just 1? Because this isn't the first time they've done it. |
Yes, just one, that's enough.
What you linked to is far from being an answer though - instead of providing the plausible explanation that I asked for in my question, you're instead simply referring to a similar case, where NATO countries were also quick at pointing fingers towards russia, but ultimately never provided any actual proof for these claims.
That is as if I were accusing you of having killed Martin Luther King - and when you're asking for a plausible explanation how you could have done that, given the fact that you weren't even born back at the time, I'm answering by linking to an old thread were I also accused you of having shot JFK...
So, once again:
Please, name me just one plausible explanation why russia, out of all the billions of reliable ways they could have killed the guy, they decided to try to kill him in the one way that instantly points towards them, and which is obviously extremely unreliable (since none of the victims died so far).
