By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
MC gives different weights to different sites. So random fan site A B or C rating a game 15 points higher than the average, won’t have the effect assumed. Especially if that website has a history of “inflating” review scores. Also, until all review sites use the same scoring method, sites like MC and OC are flawed and should not be taken seriously.

To use the OPs example game, if I were to review SoT right now I’d say 7/10. Which converts to a 70 on MC. But if I were using a 5 point scale, I’d say it’s about a 2.5 out of 5. To me, that’s right about at a 7/10 game. But in MC, it translates literally, which means 50. But what if I use a letter system? I’d say SoT is a good C game right now. A C is not bad. I’d love a C in some of my college classes right now. But on MC a C is a 50. There are just too many different scoring systems with their own interpretations to take these aggregate sites seriously.

Please tell me why 7/10 translates to 2.5 instead of 3.5 on a five point scale. Don't take this question as anything aggro. You've filled me with wonder. 

Last edited by COKTOE - on 25 March 2018

- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."