| Azzanation said: Erm no thanks, I would love to see more from Rare. And as much as you hate the game, others actually love it. Its unique and something new. I much rather more risks like SoTs than the same old sequels we get every year. Why would you support shutting down a studio? |
I'm not even invested in the game ...
And I support studio's producing the best results they can, everything else is secondary and Rare has been on a bad streak lately ...
| flashfire926 said: his philosophy is that "the developers are only as good as their last release"(paraphrasing). Its obviously a very flawed philosophy because if studios were shut down after one bad outing, so many great games we know and love wouldn't exist. |
It still remains true and I didn't imply that a studio can't redeem itself but right now Rare is sub-par considering their pedigree and the same goes for many other developers until they learn to standout or die trying ...
| iceland said: Rare has been profitable nearly every year while LH was bleeding money. I don't see them closing anytime soon SoT already surpassed my expectations with over 1m players, I think MS will be happy with it's performance. |
It'll be interesting to see the revenue stream of SoT a couple months after the game launches ...
