pokoko on 22 March 2018
| eva01beserk said: This game would have fared better if it was priced lower. I would say no more than $30 since its so barebone. If they do add the good content later, then charge for the other half then. I dont see the point in these games as services costing $60 out the gate. I would rather they be super cheap, like free to $10, then with each content pack charge a small amount, like $5. They can do that for years. Would certainly review better. |
That's the point, though. They want to steer you into the subscription rather than the one-time purchase. If the game cost $30, people might just buy it outright. At $60, however, it leads people to believe that the clear value is the subscription.
