By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jason1637 said:
vivster said:

I don't necessarily agree with that."Finish" is also subjective, especially in online games.

Chances are if the reviewer forced himself to finish the game despite being bored to death the final verdict might be even worse.

For games like SoT, Destiny and the Division the end game is very important for the longevity of the game so I think it's important that the reviewer reaches the end game.

Not all reviews are the same and they should never be. It depends on the reviewer and his audience. Reviews are public services for consumers and if the reviewer wants to highlight that the slog to the endgame just isn't worth it, then that's useful. There are plenty of other reviewers out there for people who are into this kind of game and want to know what the endgame looks like. Not all reviews should be made by people who are fan of the genre for fans of the genre.

You don't see car salesmen forcing their customers to drive a few hundred miles more because only then it gets good when they step out of the car and already have enough.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.