which has a better game line up for 2008 xbox360 or ps3

[selnor]

epinefridis said:

disolitude said:

I Perdict said:

 

 

 

For B. Left 4 Dead and Gears...Valve and Epic versus Insomniac and...umm... In any case, based on their previous shooter history Id rate these games in following order

 

1. Left 4 Dead, 2. Gears 2, 3. Resistance 2........ 34. Socom

 

 

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Anyway, that would be my order if L4D was a solid single player experience. But unfortunately, as far as I'm aware of it isn't. So No 1 is Gears.

And what is it with R2. The first videos are out. I just watched the Chicago gameplay video. ...and?...what? Is this an anticipated shooter? (i'm not reffering to the multiplayer part). This seems like just another generic FPS (like the first Resistance was) . Can please anyone tell me, what was the mindblowing with this video? Please!

Nothing to say about SOCOM. It was the only ...decent  shooter along with the really bad Killzone 1 for PS2. Just like Resistance 1 for PS3. People were FORCED to play and like these games because nothing else existed! Call of Duty 2.... Best WW2 shooter ever... 360 launch title... 360 audience has much more elegant taste in shooters (oh! Half Life 2 on XBOX, Best FPS ever made)

Yes I watched that trailer to. Definately proves the previous clips of R2 was CGI. The game looks very bland and generic as you say. Also the Locust army in Gears is far better, especially if this Chicago video is anything to go by.