John2290 said:
o_O.Q said:
well its all in the spirit of making everything "safe"
of making interactions between imperfect people perfect
because apparently we are living in an era where no one wants to be responsible and retain some degree of their individuality when facing the challenges of life so therefore they need a daddy above them to handle things for them
"a guy catcalls a woman? well since she's a female she's too much of an infant to handle the situation herself, so we need laws to take that responsibility away from her"
and i seriously wonder if the people pushing this are aware that this is essentially their argument?
that's not to say that we don't need to limit risks with laws, but what i'm saying is that there's a reasonable balance between the two and that fining or jailing people for speech that is not threats is way too restrictive
|
They are aware. Follow the money that is funding leftist protests across the US and groups like black lives matter and it leads to some very high places, some of the richest people in the world or people who own the largest corporations. I wish I hadn't looked into it because it leaves only three scenarios, these people are trying to better the world (unlikely), they are bored and playing games or they have an agenda to which this benefits them.
|
i'm aware of what you're talking about, but i'm actually referring to the foot soldiers that simply follow the ideological nonsense that trickles down from the top
and no its not to better society, its about control and that's why critical thinking is under such an attack
