By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
John2290 said:
Peh said:

We make our own reality.

The less muscles presented in the feminine body is not the issue here, at all. What else do you think makes us so distinctive from other living organism on this planet which are way stronger than we are? Our intelligence. What we can't solve with physics we use tools. A taser would suffice in such a situation. Too bad none of these women had one.  

Do you know where the term "right" origins from and what I am even implying? I don't think so. 

Also, a law will be made if there is a need to protect people from other ones. Otherwise, there is no reason for it. Seeing that Belgium went the mile in creating this one and seeing it being actually applied by your OP, shows what kind of mentally some people hold out there. It's actually really sad. 

You can't be series, are you denying women are less physically strong than men and that this can be made truth if we believe it. 

If there was a gang warfare going on in your neighbourhood that directly effected you and posed a real threat, big strong gang member with knuckle dusters attacking random people. Would you want a 75% women to 25% male police force or 75 % men to 25 % female? Women, deserve a place in law enforcement but like in the Army, not on the frontline. Physical strength is not redundant because we are able to build tools, it may well be in the far future but right now we still need police who have at least some ability to fight off an attacker and actually protect the public, not be placeholders to call for male backup when shit gets tough cause at that rate all they are doing is taking male jobs.

 

"You can't be series, are you denying women are less physically strong than men"

if that's really the case how do you account for women like rhonda roussey? who blow your whole theory out of the water?