By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DélioPT said: 

The exaggeration comes from Miyamotoo, and you apparantely, trying to use the "it's always possible to do better" as means to not look if it really is possible or not for Switch to grow substantially or not.
It's a way to mute a reasoning with relativism instead of facts or constructive reasoning: "Are you not paying attention, cause I've repeatedly been saying that things can always be better, hence why it's a moot point."  

So a bad line-up can't overshadowed by other factors like better stock, really popular HW concept that remains fresh, 4 system sellers?

Again, the comment was in regards to a expectation from Zorg. 

Yes, it's a bad year in terms of game releases.

 

So we don't go around in circles, you think that arguing that Switch could do better if there were more new games and more system sellers, is na irrelevant discussion, right?
Ok, i don't. I couldn't even imagine howthat we would be true, specially when Switch's first year clearly shows how a great line-up can do wonders, compared to what, i don't know, pretty much every other console?

Honestly, there's no point in going back and forth if we don't even agree on the above.

Again not an exaggeration, a fact. X year's line-up will garner more sales if you add Y games to it.

If the sales are good, then clearly the line-up was good enough to work with the other selling points. 

There's nothing to argue there, the Switch would do better with more games. That is always the case, and thus not a measure of how good they're doing. Again using your logic I could say 2017 was bad because it woulda sold better had they also released Animal Crossing, Pokemon, Mario Maker, and a ham sandwich. While the reasoning is technically true, it's pointless to say when they stil had great sales proving it's not a bad year.