By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MasterThief said:

how did this turn into a sony vs microsoft again?

shouldn't the moderator be banning this garbage that is derailing this thread?

 

now on topic. it would be an incredible feat to make PS3 games backwards compatible without any online patches like the way it 360 works on xb1.  tho I hope they do that and allow the game patches to come through as well.

 

I hope they do that. I have some 120 PS3 games. 

I also have over 100 PS3 games, but I haven't turned my PS3 on since I bought PS4 and probably won't care much about playing PS3 games on PS5... Sure that some older games I do like to replay, but also prefer the improvements they do on remasters.

But sure, more option is better if there aren't a significant additional cost.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."