The sjw review by eurogamer on Kingdom Come: Deliverance

[DonFerrari]

Machiavellian said:

DonFerrari said:

I read what he said, and after reading and seeing he was wrong I put it as SJW shenanigan, not the other way around. And when you are giving OPINION you don't go there and put a "specialist" to reinforce it unless you want to make it a fact.

His opinion on the first half of the review is worth a merit because it discuss the game and funny enough he likes the game (which later he will say he wouldn't recommend because the creator is racist and the game lacks diversity). I rather evaluate his review than trying to either give it more weight or bash based on his historic (that would be prejudice on the review). So his second half which is he upholding his agenda is what becomes not worth.

What is the proof that he is wrong.  Did you do your own history search during that time period.  Have you actually followed the developer of the game and know his history.  I believe if you want to validate your opinion you definitely do you homework and that would be to check with someone who knows the period of time.  Just because its an opinion doesn't mean it should not be an informed one.

One of the reason I read reviews instead of just looking at a score because I want to know what the reviewer thought about a game and what are their pros and cons.  Not all the time do I agree or care about some pros or cons.  If I care about a certain developer and their behavior which I do not agree with then that could be a reason for me to not support their game.  Its a reasonable thing to bring up, the only thing is if the claims are valid.

Yes I done my homework, just go on the eurogamer page and see all the posted against his "what if" scenario... and he already start at fault by saying the source as "a specialist I talked to", without providing source, textual document from the guy or evidence of what he is saying to be true... as all the so called specialist said is that there would be a possibility that there could be a black guy, he never presented evidence that there was he just questioned why there couldn't be... and as such the burden of proof goes on him... and he was blatantly wrong on the silk road passing through the city/area as posted in this very thread.

Stop BS man, do you do any research on the historic of the people involved on all the entertainment you consume?

And again, coming back... no the claims aren't valid. The silk road doesn't pass nearby, using a T-shirt of a band isn't the same as being a neonazist and being sided with developers against the reviewers on the gamergate scandal isn't a lapse of character.