By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
twintail said:
pokoko said:

Just because you cut off the rest of my post doesn't mean it goes away.

Did you not read the "they should have invested in existing multimedia IP or developed their own using their assets in film and anime production" part?  Did you not read the part where I said they had nothing to appeal to kids?

How many of those games you listed had popular installments on the Vita, which was the very point of my post?

Well actually it does, thats why I cut it off. 

The rest of your post is pretty much held together by your erroneous comment that they didn't develop IP for the PSP. Once you cut that from your original comment, the rest of what you wrote falls away too.

Now, if everything you wrote hinged on the idea that Sony developed new IP, with existing IP, for the PSP, and to an extent the Vita, but then failed to capitalise on said IPs by not structuring a larger brand identity behind them, then yeah I would agree with you.

But you said they didnt develop new IP for the PSP, and everything else you wrote is in an effort to backup that claim.

And thats incorrect.

You cut it off so you could create a strawman.  Either that, or your reading comprehension sucks and you simply didn't understand the contextual modification.  A child could understand my point after reading the entire post.  That you claim to understand yet just want to argue over the first sentence as though the rest of the post does not exist is just silly.