| MasterThief said: damn I made an account just to voice my opinion Sony didn't lose much money on vita. because they never invested in it to begin with. it has phone parts. nothing developed in house. they didn't lose money on first party titles because they made none or form any studios or partnerships just for the vita.
the PS3 was a huge failure. it almost killed the entire company and whoever decided it should have been designed that way denied many of us of half a generation worth of games. it was also a big factor to a lot of studios closing down because they were so used to PS1/PS2 hardware which were basically the same so that they just didn't bother making PS3 games because it was too hard and expensive. also instead of developing software emulation over time they decided to put PS2 parts on the old phat ps3 which I can imagine added hundreds of millions in cost of development. PS3 Pros good HDMI, Blu ray -------------- PS3 cons cell processor, generally weak GPU because they depended on cell processor , trying to Frankenstein a backwards compatible console. seperate Ram pools. tho mostly the cell processor it was just atrocious design. |
That happens to many lurkers. Welcome.







