The sjw review by eurogamer on Kingdom Come: Deliverance

[DonFerrari]

Machiavellian said:

DonFerrari said:

Most people aren't reviewer or are stating their opinion as facts professionally.

Half his review is based on the alleged lack of diversity and prejudice of the game creator. So it isn't so much a case of singling out, even more when the OP said the first half was a good "objective" analysis of the game, while the second part was SJW shenanigan.

When he goes and say he consulted an expert and them put developer can't prove that was totally impossible to have a black person there and that the expert gave him a very flimsy "can't prove or disprove" what if scenario and he used that to bash the lack of diversity that was trying to make it a fact.

I'm 3/4 black slave descendant and married to a Japanese descendant woman and developer study seems much more substantiated on its 3 year research than the quick tackle of the "unnamed specialist" that say perhaps a black person could be there since you can't prove it was totally impossible... you also can't prove it was impossible for a Chinese, yet he isn't pointing that. He is trying to push an agenda.

I consider that interpretation.  In other words when you read something, what makes you believe someone is stating something as a fact or as their opinion.  All reviews are opinion pieces.  People disagree with reviewers opinion all the time and for every person that sees that opinion as justified, another sees it differently.  The reviewer mention the allege prejudice of the developer.  Some will find this important some will not.  Just like some people have issues with companies, studios and publishers who policies they like or do not.  To just blindly throw what he stated out because you placed it in your SJW bucket shows a prejudice in yourself.

This particular reviewer stated what he thought.  He stated he consulted someone who is verse in that time period.  Its up to the reader to either care or not care if his opinion is worth merit.  Usually I would say it comes down to knowing the work of the reviewer and understanding if their opinion is of any merit.  

I read what he said, and after reading and seeing he was wrong I put it as SJW shenanigan, not the other way around. And when you are giving OPINION you don't go there and put a "specialist" to reinforce it unless you want to make it a fact.

His opinion on the first half of the review is worth a merit because it discuss the game and funny enough he likes the game (which later he will say he wouldn't recommend because the creator is racist and the game lacks diversity). I rather evaluate his review than trying to either give it more weight or bash based on his historic (that would be prejudice on the review). So his second half which is he upholding his agenda is what becomes not worth.