By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
potato_hamster said:
DonFerrari said:

And around that time, excluding any migration. as a "rule of thumbs" the average skin color would be near that graph pemalite sent.

... but that graph is of the skin tone of "indigenous people" as of 2007, not 1400. If it was, the entire continent of North America would be pretty err... "reddish brown"?. For example, The Innu and Inuit of Northern Canada have lived in that area for millennia. They look pretty similar to other "Native Americans" and they have lived there for thousands of years. But according to this graph, the average skin tone of the "indigenous" people that live in the areas they traditionally inhabited have about the same skin tone of English, French, Irish, Dutch, and Skandanavian people. You know, the people that migrated to that area and have lived there now for 400-500 years.

So unless you want to state with a straight face that these people (Inuit):

 

have the same skin tone as these people (Norse)



These I think we should stop referencing this graph as relevant to the conversation about what skin tones people had in the area now known as the Czech republic 600 years ago.

Yep, and its kinda noticeable the difference in skin color between the inuit and siberian even thought both are very high latitude and living among the ice



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."