By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
John2290 said:

We've established you think AR is the future but have you considered the possibility that the reason VR isn't to your liking atm because you are always looking to the future. At any rate. I'm not going to argue with ya, your money your time.

To the point of it still being a screen though, Of course it is who is saying it is matrix level shit? It may be two screens but it does what it says on the tin extremely effectively, so much so that it has already gained a niche market with a great attach rate who are enjoying it right NOW, not 5 years in the future when todays software will feel out of date. We are talking about games here so this analogy might be a little extreme but you could be hit by a bus tomorrow and never get to experience VR gaming. 

As for which headset you choose, it's about the software as with any other device, you may not like Sony or microsofts products but who give a fuck about the damn box, it's the enjoyment of the stuff you get to do with the box i.e the games and consoles have the best games. Anyway, I'll leave it at that, don't want this to turn into throwing walls of text back and forth.

I see where you are coming from at any rate, we just seem to disagree a bit, lol. Anyway, didn't you say you might buy the Oculus GO (Not recommenced) or was that someone else. Hmm, you could always sacrifice a few titles like sprint vector and grab one of the entry level MR devices which I hear are just as good and most of the key games are playable, they are also inching close to that 200 euro mark of the Oculus GO and since I assume you have a PC capable of VR with that Master race signature you're all set. Heck, I'm sure you could buy a used one or find a deal online for under 200. 

Again, wall of text aversion. hehe. My brain can't handle conversations that turn into full on novels.

No, I think AR *has a future*, not "is the one and only future", like some people seem to think VR is. 

Of course I'm looking to the future, because the current VR state and offerings aren't really up to par of what we should be expecting. If I were to pay the high price for the Vive for example, I'd expect high quality content all around, but with all 3 headsets it's a hit or miss with the libraries so far. 

Matrix level?. We ain't there yet mate.

Of course you'd have to be able to see what's being displayed on the two screens effectively, because if you didn't it would be a borked product. I could be hit by a bus tomorrow or die by something else, but I'm in no hurry to get "hip and get square" with VR, not with it's current price tag and lacking quality. 

 

Like I said, I'm not interested in either of the two systems, which means not only their specs, but also their offerings. "i.e the games and consoles have the best games", what's that supposed to mean?.

 

The headset I mentioned prior that I would be interested in was the Vive, but they mentioned the Vive pro not too long ago, so I'll be watching on how that headset develops over the next year or two. 

I've got a rig that is more than enough to handle VR, it's just that I'm not choosing to invest in it anytime soon. 



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"