By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Intrinsic said:
Ljink96 said:

Obviously, there's a disconnect between what each of us thinks a generation is. I'll just leave it at that. Using CPUs to gauge generational leaps is as broken as ever, as Nintendo again puts a wrench in the logic in this thread as Nintendo consoles haven't been generational leaps since the 64 to Gamecube. There's just no right or wrong answer, I'll just stick with my interpretation. And that's really all you can do. 

Sigh..... you are over the place. The nintendo switch is more powerful than the wiiU. has features that the wiiu lacks. You cannot make a game for the switch and it will by default work on the wiiU.

I don,t know qhy you think gens are gauged by the CPU, the wholw reason the CPU came into this was cause it was the easiest way to prove a poibt to you that you have just refuswd to grasp. 

Gens are about new things that are possble that requires new hardware to run. 

You know what nvm.......

lol, you said that CPU is the main driver behind it! You're all over the place too! I'm just stating facts here. Dude, if gens were based on new things that are possible through new hardware, there should have been 20 generations by now, lol. Yes, please just forget it. Because there is no concrete definition for game console generations, and because one company thinks differently than the other, neither of us are right. Like I said, stick with how you interpret it. Done.

Last edited by Ljink96 - on 03 March 2018