scrapking said:
The problem with that is that sometimes the first sign of a health problem is death. Look at Kevin Smith (who's now considering going vegan in the wake of his massive heart attack). It's pretty difficult to course-correct if the first symptom is death. Other times the first symptom is cancer. Cholo-rectal cancers are amongst the cancers tightly correlated to eating animal products, but there are many more. Dietary changes do a better job of preventing disease than they do curing disease. |
Serious question(s) if you are indeed 44 have you not noticed that dietary "science" is a constantly changing animal? What is good for you one year "causes cancer and is bad m'kay" 5 years later only to once again be good for you three years after that.
Also how common is fossilized human stool? A search for coprolite returned mostly things of this nature:
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/06/140625-neanderthal-poop-diet-ancient-science-archaeology/
not sure how this relates to your statement "A whole food vegan diet is more paleo than the so-called "paleo diet"."
Also, going against my link, is a single recovered stool sample really a good way to come to a conclusion about what "people" let alone A person ate regularly?
A single turd is but a snaphot of part of my diet and does not describe in whole what i normally eat. Yesterday's salad is today's turd like Monday's steak dinner was the turd before that.
Not trying to be an ass as I am not well versed in this area so feel free to include links to further my knowledge.
