The sjw review by eurogamer on Kingdom Come: Deliverance

[DonFerrari]

CosmicSex said:

DonFerrari said:

He pointed pretty clear what he have against the review.

The reviewer used a single source that give a "what if 0,001%" chance scenario to ask why the dev didn't include a black person and then go to a personal attack of the dev preferences, his stance against gamergate, censorship and using a band T-shirt... have you read the thread or just decided to attack OP?

He says:

"We know of African kings in Constantinople on pilgrimage to Spain; we know of black Moors in Spain; we know of extensive travel of Jews from the courts of Cordoba and Damascus; we also know of black people in large cities in Germany," the historian, Sean Miller, tells me. Czech cities Olomouc and Prague were on the famous Silk Road which facilitated the trade of goods all over the world. If you plot a line between them, it runs directly through the area recreated in Kingdom Come. "You just can't know nobody got sick and stayed a longer time," he says. "What if a group of black Africans came through and stayed at an inn and someone got pregnant? Even one night is enough for a pregnancy."

Its this wrong?  I am asking for you to present facts that he is wrong.

Also, you don't see anything with him supporting a convicted mureder?  You don't think anyone anywhere would see anything wrong with that unless they are SJW because according to you everyone is okay with racial killings?

To even suggest that this guy may have a racial issue or even an issue with 'good taste' doesn't make one and SJW.  I suppose when you hear about people being targeted or killed for their ethnicity, it is just supposed to wash over you like a caressing breeze and you are supposed to automatically go out and support that person lol.  Okay bud.

The only reason why any of the PoC thing is even important is because the biggest thing this game is supposed to be know for is historical accuracy. 

Don't try to pin me down with auto hate and misdirection.  I don't respond to that.  Give me facts of the era and then tell me if the reviewer has a point in his criticism.   You had a point with about him having one source.  That is a correct argument to make against his claim.  You are using facts.    That is all I care for here.  What historian do you have to contradict the one sited here?

Yes he is wrong. As posted by the thread on his very review showing that the silk road is very very far from bohemia and that it was more Asia to Europe than any Africa to Europe movement.

So the very premise of his "what if scenario" is wrong, besides the fact that even his what if (if the route was passing through that place) considering the size of the region and what was the suposition would be such a small probability that there is no point in pointing that the game is inaccurate because of the lack of black people... also I haven't seem he complaining of the lack of asian or latin people.

Which convicted murderer is he allegedly formally (with evidence) supporting? And what bearing does that have to do with the game? Are you also going back and re-review all products that someone was convicted later and change scores because somehow his personal life changed the product after you discover the fact?

The very historic check of the game already contradict the reviewer who brought a single (unnamed?) source that said there was a possibility of having a black, which for any case doesn't make it like a "should" or "would". So he is basically bashing the game because perhaps there could be a black person in the are "IF" and insert wrong suppositions.