John2290 said:
No. From the start our mission statement was to fight for women to have the choice to be objectified, don't get it twisted. We will free these women, if of course they want, from their clothing...you know, for the good of women. |
This seems to be a worthwhile fight.
Teeqoz said:
I didn't really change my stance, but maybe you got a clearer picture of what my stance actually was, which would make sense given we've written like 5A4 pages explaining to each other. As it stands, the statement "grid girls are not absolutely necessary for a formula racing tournament" is valid because it uses an indefinite article. No more distinction is necessary. You shouldn't have assumed it went further than what was actually written. Not necessary for a formula racing tournament does not imply not necessary for any formula racing tournament, hence that was an unsound assumption of you to make. |
Sorry man but to me "a formula racing tournament" is equivalent to "any formula racing tournament" without distinction to which you are talking about, while "this formula racing tournament" or "F1 tournament" would be precise use.... you are trying to slime your way out of it.
And still haven't said why you are against grid girls and why we have to get rid of them (which reinforce your point of them not being necessary in any racing tournament).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."








