Aeolus451 said:
No, it's not.
You're describing sjws ironically. Again, you're showcasing your lack of knowledge or biased perception. The reviewer wanted the game to be more politically correct. He written a sjw review of a game. No one is arguing against that. Where did I say was a victim? Where did I say I was being attacked? |
I said every time you don't want to here someone's opinion you classify SWJ and you start this victim crap over and over. It is lame. I am arguing that the review was critical of the promise of historical accuracy. I am arguing that you and others have been trolled in such a way that you are no longer able to even encounter this kind of criticism without assuming the role of the victim. I am arguing that this is not an SJW review. Ask yourself what don't you like about the review. Be honest. Be specific. Reclaim your right to think for yourself. Freedom is the ability to express yourself. The dark place you guys want us to go, where some views are ignored or superseded by your bias 100% of the time is not welcomed. Let the SJW label go and if you feel that the reviewer is wrong just offer a rebuttal.
