By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 23 February 2018
Edit Thread
Teeqoz said:
Aura7541 said:

And that was what I was simply trying to say all this time. But apparently, I have to go full rocket science jargon to get that point across.

Needed for Formula E and NASCAR =/= needed to have a formula racing tournament altogether. Are you unable to see that distinction? I have acknowledged that NASCAR and Formula E deemed them necessary for their companies' business, but that, once again, doesn't mean they are necessary to have a Formula racing tournament. They might be necessary for their Formula racing tournament, but not necessary for each and every one of them. Do you legitimately not see the difference between those two things?

I really can't see why the telegraphic example would be more near and valid than this one... or have you registered for your self the use of not 1:1 analogy?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."