By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 22 February 2018
Edit Thread
KManX89 said:
DonFerrari said:

haircuts is as cosmetic as it can get, so even though I have no love for EA if all nick and dime was done like this I would have zero issue. Lootboxes and the like as well, if I can have a good experience on the game and the extra pay is just for extra clothing (as long as the already included is already good) and I don't need to pay for it to have a good game I'm fine with it.

>Defending the charging of a basic feature (character customization) as a microtransaction. 
>Looking past the fact that they tried to squeeze more money out of you in doing so.

What next? Companies start charging you for additional character saves? Oh wait, that happened already and as usual, fanboys tried to defend it. 

I don't defend or even like ea much less am a fanboy of them. Still I'll repeat cosmetic nick anddime isn't an issue for me. 



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."