| DonFerrari said: No sorry... A company removing a position because it's unneeded isn't like a company retaining a position because it is needed. Only the points that strength my argument shall be used, reverse or equivalence that weakens it isn't acceptable, so don't try to rule out my argument using further evidence that disproves it /obvious sarcasm. |
And that was what I was simply trying to say all this time. But apparently, I have to go full rocket science jargon to get that point across.







