By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KManX89 said:
flashfire926 said:

There might be microtrasactions, but I played and enjoyed, reasonably progressed, without having to spend a single penny. I never felt nagged to either.

Keep in mind this was 2013-2015 on x360 version, so if things have changed now, I dont know about that.

They also charged for friggin' player haircuts in NBA 2K, let's not forget. Even worse, they tried to squeeze additional money out of their players by not even lending a preview and charging you for the old hairdo if you didn't like it.

Take-Two is paddling up shit creek alongside EA, Konami, Bunglevision, WB and Ubisoft. No wonder they tried to defend EA's shitty antics by saying loot boxes aren't gambling even though they clearly are.

haircuts is as cosmetic as it can get, so even though I have no love for EA if all nick and dime was done like this I would have zero issue. Lootboxes and the like as well, if I can have a good experience on the game and the extra pay is just for extra clothing (as long as the already included is already good) and I don't need to pay for it to have a good game I'm fine with it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."