By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SuperNova said:
DonFerrari said:

So basically you want devs to limit themselves and choose instances where they could satisfy your demands.

No. And I didn't say anything to that effect either. I also didn't demand anything at all. Please don't let your offense blind you to a reasonable post.

All I did say is that clearly this dev made choices of what they wanted in their game and these choices didn't include a desire for diversity or female representation. I then proceded to say, and I quote: 'That's fine.'

The reason these are not in the game is not 'historic accuracy' it is that they didn't want to include them as part of their vision and that's fine.

I saw all your convoluted explanation. And it wasn't "there can be stories of medieval Europe with black people or woman", but more like "if they weren't racist misogynists they could chose a story that would include then without being less precise".

Let's not forget that when you have 99% data showing one thing and you chose the 1% that is different then that is the forced choice.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."