Teeqoz said:
Of course. I never said otherwise...
Well, the impression I got was that it just wasn't a very good movie and that's why it didn't perform well.
I read all of it, but it was pretty confusingly worded. Couple that with the first part of the sentence which directly contradicted the rest, and I had a hard time figuring out what you actually meant. No worries though, as you cleared it up.
Voting with your wallet is absolutely a legitimate way to voice your opinion! I'm just confused, are you now saying that you don't really mind? Because that wasn't the impression I got first. |
I also think it isn't a good movie... but the flag that was raised is that it is at least as good as GB2 and that people just didn't go because they are sexist that doesn't want woman being protagonists.
Good that my convoluted wording was cleared =]
I would prefer more content made to my taste, but I won't pester publishers or companies to pander to me. I may influence friends and people close to look at content or products that are more aligned with taste and values but I won't try to change companies. Even more because people that go that way usually try to make the government pressure the companies to align with them instead of looking for alternatives or seeing that it opens an opportunity for himself.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







