By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
Qwark said:

Considering all fastest lap times are from 2003-2005 it's not even about speed. It's all about money and having the fastest ride under your ass, so dricing for the right team. During the 20th century we had a different winner almost every season. Why because some drivers where willing to take more risks even though they did not have the fastest car. The last eight seasons a single brand pretty much won by default. Now that doesn't have anything to do with being the fastest or best driver, but with luck.

Now the 1960's 1970's and the 1980's where to dangerous. But between 1995 and 2014 there wasn't a single fatal accident. Nonetheless the sport became more and more restricted from 2007 and onwards. Even when we got a driver who is willing to take risks  (Verstappen) it's more and more getting fround upon, especially by Ferrari. Being the fastest driver should being about being the fastest because you dare to take corners the fastest way, last minute breaking and overtaking. However that driving style isn't rewarded anymore, if anything you get penalties. All leading to the fact that when your ride is faster you pretty much win by default.

Absolutely 100% false.

Sure it is arguably more about the team than the driver now. But you don't get a good car by just flipping a coin and relying on luck. It takes a lot of skill and effort to build a winning car. And the driver isn't picked out of a hat for the car either, they're recruited based on being good and also play an active role in the ongoing development of the car (it has to be built around the way they drive to get the best out of both car and driver). You can argue that the best cars win all the time, but 9 times out of 10 the best drivers are going to be in the best cars anyway, so it's still the best drivers that are winning races in those cars.

But then we have Ayrton Senna on Toleman winning on Monaco on his first year and being stripped of the victory... or Michael Schumacher on his first years as well... Sorry but as Qwark said, pre 00's F1 had more weight on the driver than cars... unless you want to believe we now only have 2 good drivers on a season.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."