Ka-pi96 said:
Absolutely 100% false. Sure it is arguably more about the team than the driver now. But you don't get a good car by just flipping a coin and relying on luck. It takes a lot of skill and effort to build a winning car. And the driver isn't picked out of a hat for the car either, they're recruited based on being good and also play an active role in the ongoing development of the car (it has to be built around the way they drive to get the best out of both car and driver). You can argue that the best cars win all the time, but 9 times out of 10 the best drivers are going to be in the best cars anyway, so it's still the best drivers that are winning races in those cars. |
But then we have Ayrton Senna on Toleman winning on Monaco on his first year and being stripped of the victory... or Michael Schumacher on his first years as well... Sorry but as Qwark said, pre 00's F1 had more weight on the driver than cars... unless you want to believe we now only have 2 good drivers on a season.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







