By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CGI-Quality said:
pikashoe said:

His reply literally says that he wasn't refuting that it got good reviews last gen. The point he is making is that he feels the game was overrated last gen, and that this gen the reviews are more in line with how he views the game.

Best to just agree to disagree, at this point. My discussion with him has already been solved and I got what he was saying.

@ Alkibiádēs: Having a second look at this gen's scores, I wouldn't really call 76, 77, and 79 mediocre. Just not as strong as it was last gen.

Some games were groundbreaking when originally made but when simply ported they are less than stellar on the new landscape... that certainly doesn't make the game score inflated or overrated when it launched.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."