| RolStoppable said: If you hate to be that guy, then don't be it. The final sentence of the article states that there are still stock issues, but that didn't stop the usual suspects (a.k.a. fatslob and quickrick) to claim that stock issues are non-existent despite specifically quoting the paragraph of the article that states there are still stock issues. |
Well I was commenting more on the fact that the "Switch barely has supply constraints" argument is actually pretty valid right now, as opposed to defending "the usual suspects". Alk pretty much just waved his hand in dismissal at an argument just because users he doesn't like used that argument, which is ok, but the article itself pretty much supports the argument that stock issues are almost non-existent. They're still there, but if that's what you're correcting me on than my comment literally says so and uses specific wording just to be clear that there still are some stock issues. If you're trying to get me on the technicality that fatslob and the like are arguing there are no stock issues, then let me say that I was merely suggesting that the issue is a bit more complicated than simply "There are stock issues!" and "There aren't stock issues!", because both those positions are just a way of defending or attacking a piece of plastic. I'm not defending "the usual suspects" from Alk, merely saying there is some basis that we shouldn't forget...
Last edited by AngryLittleAlchemist - on 18 February 2018
