By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nuvendil on 09 February 2018
Edit Thread
Peh said:
curl-6 said:

Well, when you bring things like alternate dimensions into play, there's no reason the universes of Xenoblade 1 and 2 have to play by the same rules. Alvis says he was the "administrative computer" of the facility, which is basically what the Trinity Processor is. Hence Klaus saying that Ontos initiated a phase transition event and disappeared ties in pretty directly into Xenoblade 1, where Alvis ended up in that universe and says he was the computer in charge of the facility that performed the experiment. It seems very clear the way I read it.

A processor is not a computer.

Also, Ontos would have a core crystal like Pyra and Malos. Alvis doesn't have one.

Alvis said ( I have to check on this) that his family was serving the high entia, because of their foresight features. He was born into the family. So, he didn't lived as long as Mythra and Malos.

It starts to not making much sense...

 

Nevertheless, as I said, if Alvis would be Ontos, Klaus would be aware of his positwuion.  

 

1) That is splitting hairs.  Also, it technically is by the black letter definition.

2)  Alvis can easily conceal his core, he has god level powers in the parallel universe.  Which btw, Pneuma has similar abilities.  Also, The Xenoblade 1 universe appears to have been a sort of blank dimension, a clean slate, that Alvis along with Zanza and Meyneth (using Alvis's power, the power of the Conduit) shaped.  Hence why he would be so all powerful there.  He even references he came from that exact same station.  

3) Alvis lied.  I would think that was quite obvious when he was revealed to be part of the "Trinity", an alliance of characters centuries if not millennia old.

4) Klaus has profoundly limited perception of the parallel universes, he can only make out the state of his other self.

And Klaus did. not. recreate the Trinity Processor.  He even references the fact it was built by a group of people when he speaks with Malos and mentions his name, Logos.  Both it and the state are original.   

In short, he is Ontos.  You're overcomplicating what is ultimately a very straight forward and clear reference.