By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
Final-Fan said:

So, basically, what you are saying is that it's OK for businesses that are open to the public to discriminate against certain members of the public who want to be customers based on political boundaries.  For instance, if your neighborhood grocery store charged more to anyone who lived outside the neighborhood, with no way for them to "get a membership" other than by moving to the neighborhood. 

What if your local store said "OK, members of the PSB party have to pay twice as much"—OK?  (United for Brazil coalition, I picked one blindly from Wikipedia)

What about other forms of discrimination?  "No bread for black people"—OK?  "No bread for Jews"—OK? 

For me even though it is biggotry and moronic, it's their business and if they want to lose money doing it the government shouldn't intervene... but all customers decide to stop buying there because of it, them I have no issues.

Business must be punished and rewarded by the value they bring to their customers, not by government big heads.

That's just great. It really shows the lengths anarcho capitalists are willing to go to defend their weird ass world view. The previous comments about government intervention should have been clear enough that this was the point you were trying to push. But thank you anyway for making it absolutely transparent now.

There's no common ground for discussion here