Wyrdness said:
No dude stop the the side stepping bs as my post did dispute WS' impact by highlighting it was more the Wii's doing and market circumstance then the game due to the factors I highlighted, your post to someone else brought impact of games into the equation of the topic of which is the better library and mentioned numbers my post addressed that which is well with in the topic. Ports are far different from BC and ironically Wii's launch title is a port itself as are the likes of Okami and RE4 and such so that argument goes against the Wii even more so that's a weak reach. |
You didn't dispute its impact. You just said it didn't last over multiple generations. Which is not to say its impact was not massive while it did last. You just changed the narrative. I am not a fool, you know.
You are correct, ports are way different. They get counted as a new game for a console with no backwards compatibility but the one with backwards compability gets absolutely no credit for having it. Makes sense to me. Oh and I fail to see the irony since Switch's Zelda is also a port. Ports count but backwards compatibility does not even though it may have been just as much a selling point as ports are today; maybe even more. Sweet.
01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000