mZuzek said:
Of course I'm salty and with good reason, but what you're saying makes no sense. No defender in a situation like that (under pressure with 5 minutes on the clock) would try a rash clearance when the ball is potentially out of reach if it's just rolling straight back to the keeper. No, not even Lovren. And as I've said before, this whole debate is really pointless, because Kane dived anyway, just as Lamela did for the second penalty, when he was also offside. If this was your team, wouldn't you be salty? You know, when Kane says "I went down because that's football", that's the most infuriating and depressing thing one could read. You'd like to think football would be characterized by moments of brilliance like Wanyama's goal or Salah's second, but no, football is diving. Great lesson learned. Edit: also, I'm not scouse lol. |
Here's how logic of the game works the ball is only heading there because it was passed meaning if not Kane someone else would have been the target as that scenario is the ball being played forward, Lovren should have been aware Kane was offside so shouldn't have gone for it instead he panicked and cause a new state of play that stopped Kane from being offside, this isn't under what I'm saying it's under the rules of the game and what an official who knows the rules have said and what is explained to managers before each season, this is something no matter how salty your are and how much you refuse to accept it can't be disputed.
What about Kane going down have we been talking about that? No so moan to someone else about it, fact is VAR is the result of people moaning about refs and decisions for years now it's here to give extra scrutiny and suddenly people are up in arms for what they asked be careful what you wish for had the situation been in reverse and Spurs had concede that penalty many of the scouse following would be behind it after all VAR nearly saved them in a previous game.
