Ka-pi96 said:
That's not how it works. A defender merely touching the ball doesn't make offside players onside. Besides, Kane's presence there was interfering as had he not been there Lovren wouldn't have had to attempt to clear the ball anyway and could have just let it run through to the goalie or out for a goal kick. The only way it wouldn't have been offside is if Lovren had controlled the ball and then played it through to Kane. An unintentional deflection doesn't play him onside though. As for the second one, if you think that's a foul then you're having a laugh mate. He never touched him. If they were using VAR there then it should have been a yellow card for diving, not a penalty. Providing the VAR actually wants to keep his job of course. |
You might want to check up on things because that's how it does work Lovren attempted to play the ball that's why offside wasn't given
"Firstly, I think it's a foul. Regarding the offside, there's no doubt Kane is initially in an offside position, but once Lovren looks to take ownership of the ball, which he tries to do without doubt, that begins a new phase of play.
The discussion between linesman Eddie Smart and Moss centres around whether a) Lovren has played the ball, and b) whether Kane impacts the play, i.e. moves towards Lovren, and interferes with play, which he doesn't. Would managers know this? When referees go into clubs at pre-season, things like this are explained. The key thing here is: did Lovren clearly try to play the ball? And he did."
The rules don't say the player has to control it, a deflection is when a ball hits a player with them unable to act not when they try to play the ball and miscontrol. VAR also wasn't used for the second one and VAR is not a person either.
Last edited by Wyrdness - on 05 February 2018






